|
|
| English: Map showing the maximum territorial extent of countries under the direct influence of the Soviet Union — between the Cuban Revolution/21st Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the 22nd Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union/Sino-Soviet split. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
For
Iran to say if
the US attacks
Syria, Iran will attack
Israel is kind of like suggesting a few things. One is that Iran and the US are equivalent powers, like the
Soviet Union and the US back in the days. I have a hard time believing Iran is the new Soviet Union. It is a little itty, bitty state.
During the
Cold War it would have been like the Soviet Union saying to the US, if you attack
Cuba, we will attack your ally
Turkey. That was proportionate talk somewhat. This talk by Iran is outlandish. Oh really? You are going to attack Israel?
I don't mean to take sides, but objectively speaking, in terms of sheer military capability, Israel could take Syria and Iran at once. Or Israel would not have been talking - like it has for years - in terms of going solo into Iran to take out its nuclear sites.
This is kind of like if
Poland threatened a trade war with the United States.
China threatening a trade war would be plausible. But Poland?
The president should not worry about Israel and do right by the people of Syria.
