NPR: In A Day Of Turmoil, Repercussions Of Soleimani Killing Grow More Widespread.https://t.co/XvIBwDiBFr— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) January 6, 2020
via @GoogleNews
Los Angeles Times: Iraq legislators vote to expel U.S. military after Iran general killed.https://t.co/tRBnuBvu3n— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) January 6, 2020
via @GoogleNews
Fox News: Pelosi moves to limit Trump’s actions in Iran with War Powers Resolution vote.https://t.co/o2xNHVmGu4— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) January 6, 2020
via @GoogleNews
Have you EVER seen such a sea of humanity in your life, @realdonaldtrump?— Javad Zarif (@JZarif) January 6, 2020
Do you still want to listen to the clowns advising you on our region?
And do you still imagine you can break the will of this great nation & its people?
End of malign US presence in West Asia has begun. pic.twitter.com/5WzYM9OBuQ
When both the US Congress and the Iraqi parliament tells you to back off, you gotta listen. Large masses are out in the streets. People are doing two plus two and seeing four. They absolutely don't want what by any measure would be an unthinkable war. And they are right.
Trump threatening Iraq with sanctions worse than the one on Iran shows he is desperate. He obviously did not think this through. And we are not even seeing the worse of the unintended consequences.
The reason I oppose and have opposed escalation is, every escalation is one step closer to an unthinkable war.
War is not a game.— Joshua Potash (@JoshuaPotash) January 5, 2020
Trump is recklessly playing Commander-in-Chief on twitter and golfing in Florida.
While our soldiers are saying goodbye to their families and deploying overseas to risk their lives.
pic.twitter.com/r9oEmWHecu
Dead animals line the roads in Australia, where fires continue to rage.— TIME (@TIME) January 6, 2020
Warning: viewers may find the following footage disturbing https://t.co/gI05HF2Ihu pic.twitter.com/NGn6gkmgvW
Is there any country besides Russia, Israel, Saudi Arabia Trump doesn’t want to go to war with?— Douglas Reber (@Douglasreber) January 6, 2020
https://t.co/6f87wHOOxh
John Bolton, President Trump's former national security adviser, said he was willing to testify in the Senate's impeachment trial if subpoenaed https://t.co/BAjNidbF4O— NYT Politics (@nytpolitics) January 6, 2020
"A powerful combination of grief and anger, with shouts of 'death to America' echoing through the streets around us." https://t.co/Ho2Tizj1C6@MarthaRaddatz reports live from Iran. pic.twitter.com/kFrcKycwSg— Good Morning America (@GMA) January 6, 2020
John Bolton says he's "prepared to testify" in Trump's Senate impeachment trial if subpoenaed. Would he also testify in the House if they subpoenaed him now? A primer on why he could be a devastating witness against the president: https://t.co/1bGUBKNAOD— Sonam Sheth (@sonam_sheth) January 6, 2020
The American people don’t want us to start a war with Iran. My bill to prevent funding for another endless war in the Middle East must be voted on in the House this week. #NoWarWithIran pic.twitter.com/pET3OTaEP6— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) January 6, 2020
#BREAKING: Schiff calls for open hearings on Trump's Iran actions https://t.co/WZYp2Hj0ce pic.twitter.com/A7intekWtu— The Hill (@thehill) January 6, 2020
"My message is simple and clear:— UN News (@UN_News_Centre) January 6, 2020
Stop escalation. Exercise maximum restraint. Re-start dialogue." -@UN Secretary-General @antonioguterres
Full remarks to the press here: https://t.co/B6bbq51Kt8
Tensions between the U.S. and Iran are at one of their highest points since the 1979 Iranian Revolution. https://t.co/kv2jFKSuSt— USA TODAY (@USATODAY) January 6, 2020
Qassem Suleimani: Dialogue Beats Escalation (2)
Arundhati Roy On India
Qassem Suleimani: Dialogue Beats Escalation
Trump's Suleimani Move: Politically Bad https://t.co/zVMbWEShV7 #NoWarInIran #NoWar #NoWarOnIran #NoWarForOil #iran #iraq #UnitedStates #DonaldTrump #Trump #TrumpsWar #Suleimani #MiddleEast
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) January 6, 2020
American intelligence created a hashtag #IraniansDetestSoleimani completely controlled by perfect English speaking bots and disinfo agents trying to push for war. It is now artificially trending as #NoWarWithIran is being pushed away.
— Anonymous ๐ (@YourMarkLubbers) January 6, 2020
Please ignore and speak against the war! pic.twitter.com/4eG2m9Czy4
The US' offensive military capability is centered around the aircraft carrier group. For the past 50 years, we've perfected this.
— Mekka Okereke (@mekkaokereke) January 5, 2020
Iran's defensive military capability is centered around sinking a US aircraft carrier. For the past 50 years, they've perfected this. pic.twitter.com/JqakFaGLoq
A diplomatic way out of the crisis with Iran is possible but unlikely, because Trump and his top aides don't want to go that path or don't know how to. https://t.co/cnYRVikF0b
— Fred Kaplan (@fmkaplan) January 6, 2020
Many journalists online are making a big deal out of US’ withdrawal from Iraq. Look at this map and all the US bases in the region. The Iraqi government is trying to please Iran, nothing more. The US is all over the Middle East. It will simply move its soldiers to another base. pic.twitter.com/uy0xHXnREp
— Imam of Peace / Pray for Peace... (@Imamofpeace) January 6, 2020
The People Around Trump Are Totally Unqualified to Stop the Iran Crisis There might still be a peaceful way out of the crisis with Iran—the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, and the United Nations, as well as such quite hawkish prominent Americans as retired Gen. David Petraeus and former Middle East envoy Dennis Ross, are urging diplomatic overtures from both sides—but President Donald Trump isn’t likely to go that route for two reasons. First, he isn’t keen on diplomacy. Second, even if he suddenly were, no one around him is very fit for the task. .....
What would a diplomatic solution look like? First, and perhaps above all, it would involve a reembracing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, also known as the Iran nuclear deal, including a gradual lifting of economic sanctions, perhaps in exchange for Iran’s cessation of attacks on U.S. targets in the region.
..... his defense secretary, retired Gen. Jim Mattis, who particularly loathed the Iranian regime, called its verification provisions as airtight as those of any treaty he’d ever read. Trump’s hatred for the deal was entirely egotistical: Congress required the president to attest, every few months, that Iran was abiding by the deal, and though Iran continued to abide, Trump could not bear to keep endorsing Barack Obama’s signal diplomatic achievement. It really is that simple. ....... We do not know what the Iranians are plotting as retaliation to Trump’s assassination of Gen. Qassem Soleimani. Neither do we know what Trump and his aides are plotting as a response to Iran’s next move. If part of that response really is an attack on Iranian “cultural targets,” as Trump warns, then we will have no active allies anywhere in the world. (We have few enough now.) ...... Many observers are saying that, surely, the Iranians won’t dare launch an attack on American interests—or, surely, Trump wouldn’t really hit cultural targets. But many unlikely things have happened in recent times, so many—some of them so outrageous—that it’s hard to gauge probabilities any longer.Pentagon Officials Reportedly “Stunned” by Trump’s Decision to Kill Soleimani Pentagon officials usually include a far-out option when they present possibilities to the president in order to make the others seem less extreme. The other options presented to Trump in Mar-a-Lago, his Palm Beach resort, included strikes against Iranian ships or missile facilities or militias backed by Iran that are operating in Iraq. “The Pentagon also tacked on the choice of targeting General Suleimani, mainly to make other options seem reasonable”...... . “My staff was briefed by a number of people representing a variety of agencies in the United States government and they came away with no feeling that there was evidence of an imminent attack,” Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico said.
The Impeachment Stalemate Is Working Fine for Democrats Mitch McConnell indicated that he had no plans of acceding to Democratic leaders’ demands that a Senate trial include witnesses and document production, as past impeachment trials did ..... McConnell said on the floor of the Senate. He also suggested that he was fine with an indefinite stalemate....... “Has there ever been an instance of such broad-scale defiance of a congressional request for information in the history of the Republic? Has there ever been anything like this?” Griffith asked DOJ attorney Hashim Mooppan. “An instruction has been given from the president of the United States not to cooperate in any form or fashion with an inquiry. Has that ever happened before?”
What’s becoming quite clear is that President Trump ordered Soleimani killed as an act of vengeance, not of self-defense. Distraction from impeachment was probably part of it too. But preventing an imminent attack? Sorry, no way. Making us less safe? Trump didn’t care about that.
— Laurence Tribe (@tribelaw) January 7, 2020
Kentucky under Mitch McConnell:
— Owen Whaley๐ฝ (@owenawhaley) January 6, 2020
48th in Health Care quality
45th in Fiscal Stability
44th in Employment
44th in Economic Opportunity
44th in Health Care
43rd in Higher Education
39th in Economy
38th in Education
He's been in office for 35 YEARS.
Vote him out.
No comments:
Post a Comment