Tuesday, August 03, 2010
Rangel And Maloney Need To Vacate The Premises And For The Same Reasons
The Rangel Drama
They both have engaged in unethical behavior. The House Ethics Committee has been too busy with Rangel, and so it has not had the time and resources to zero in on the fact that Maloney was raising Wall St PAC money the same time she was working on regulation efforts. Six other House members got caught in the net for similar behavior.
They are both old. They are both past retirement age. They have lost touch. Maloney has been there 18 years, Rangel has been there 80 years. That's enough. Now you are overstaying your welcome. It is time for a new generation to step in.
They have no new ideas. They offer no solutions. They are the problem. These are not exactly 21st century people.
The Rangel Drama
Image by Getty Images via @daylife
President Obama to Rep. Charlie Rangel: Drop Dead (shortformblog.com)So far I have refrained from digging into the details of the unfolding Rangel drama. I have not had the interest. I have had better things to do with my time. I noticed there was talk of some kind of a vacation home in the Dominican Republic, but that was in Fall 2008. He finally stepped down from whatever committee he was chairing in the House. Good for him.
Before I look into the details of the more than a dozen allegations against him, to me the political aspect is obvious. If the Rangel drama is going to play out in full view like it looks like is going to, the Dems just made their job of keeping the House that much harder. It was already a tough task to begin with. Why is the New York congressional delegation so intent on depriving my president of a House? This is no uncalled for.
I thought this guy had already announced a year before that he was not going to seek another term in office, he said he was too old. Can't dispute that. But looks like he has changed his mind.
The best thing politically for him and especially the party would have been if he just stepped down from the office. What's the pain in stepping down from an office a few months early?
I don't understand this behavior on the part of pols like Maloney who don't seem much interested in keeping the House for the Dems. Either that or she has a huge political blind spot. Neither look good.
This ethics trial will rob the Dems of much oxygen. They could have been talking about issues instead.
I am in disbelief with the stupidity, the political stupidity.
People like Maloney who feel loyal to Rangel should have been the first to ask him to vacate the premises. Leave office, go into retirement.
Starting from September 15, Reshma 2010 is going to join the national effort to keep the House. But that task just got so much harder. And so now I think I am going to be forced to read up on some of the details. This feels so unnecessary.
If the Rangel drama becomes too much of a distraction, the president should completely cut loose of him. Rangel should not be allowed to take away from Obama's intent to keep the House.
Obama, Reshma
"I think Charlie Rangel served a very long time and served his constituents very well. But these allegations are very troubling. He’s somebody who’s at the end of his career. Eighty years old. I’m sure that what he wants is to be able to end his career with dignity. And my hope is that it happens."
President Barack Obama • Saying that Charlie Rangel should retire and just go away. The House ethics subcommittee has recommended a reprimand for Rangel, which would be light compared to the censure and expulsion he could get. Still, though, Rangel won’t admit his guilt and as a result is making the situation much worse for himself.
Related articles by Zemanta
- The 14 Most Corrupt Members Of Congress Who Aren't Charles Rangel (businessinsider.com)
- Panel Hits Rangel With 13 Ethics Charges (abcnews.go.com)
- Ethics committee launches panel to investigate Rangel (thehill.com)
- Dems embrace culture of corruption - support Rangel in corruption scandal (redstate.com)
- Can Rep. Charlie Rangel Bring Down the Democratic Party? (theroot.com)
- House Ethics Panel Announces 13 Charges Against Rangel (tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com)
- Rangel Charged Wtih Ethics Violations (abcnews.go.com)
- Will Charlie Rangel Stand Trial? [Ethics] (gawker.com)
- Panel slaps Rangel with 13 ethics charges (sfgate.com)
- Charles Rangel Faces Congressional Ethics Trial (dailyfinance.com)
- Congressman Charles Rangel Is The Epitome Of What Is Wrong In DC (chicagonow.com)
- President Obama to Rep. Charlie Rangel: Drop Dead (shortformblog.com)
- House Ethics Committee To Put Rangel on Trial [Corruption] (gawker.com)
- Ethics Panel Outlines 13 Charges Against Congressman Rangel (businessweek.com)
- Rep. Charles Rangel: Today Could Be 'A Bad Day' (blogs.abcnews.com)
- No Deal: Rangel Ethics Trial Moves Forward (abcnews.go.com)
- 10 Ethics Allegations That Threaten Charlie Rangel's Job (politics.usnews.com)
- N.Y. delegation stands behind Rangel despite charges, Towns says (thehill.com)
- Charlie Rangel Never Had a Chance (newser.com)
- Michael Wolff: Charlie Rangel Never Had a Chance (huffingtonpost.com)
- Obama wants Rangel to end career with dignity (cnn.com)
- Give Rangel a chance, Gov. Paterson says (nydailynews.com)
- Gibbs: `Some very serious charges' against Rangel (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Rangel Must Go (observer.com)
- Obama calls Rangel charges `very troubling' (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Will the GOP play the race card on Rangel and Waters? (slate.com)
- Obama Speaks About Rangel For First Time: 'He's Somebody Who's At The End Of His Career' (huffingtonpost.com)
- Letters: Charges Against Rangel (nytimes.com)
- Gibbs: `Some very serious charges' against Rangel (sfgate.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)